Guardians of Truth: How Records and Archives Power Good Governance

In an age of misinformation, political spin, and fading public trust, truth has a trail, and it lives in records. Behind every transparent government or institution, every fair policy, and every accountable leader lies a well-managed system of documentation. Records provide the hard evidence behind every public decision, whether it’s a signed government or institutional contract, a council meeting minute, or a historical land title. These records are more than dusty files locked away in cabinets or databases; they are the evidence of decisions made, actions taken, and promises kept (or broken). They are the quiet yet powerful proof that holds institutions accountable and empowers citizens to ask the hard questions: What happened? Who decided? Where did the money go?

From tracking public spending to preserving national memory, records and archives serve as the foundation of democracy and good governance. They empower citizens to demand answers, help leaders make informed decisions, and ensure that justice, transparency, and accountability are not just ideals but realities. Records don’t lie, and that’s exactly why they’re essential for transparency and accountability. Without them, promises vanish, wrongdoings go unpunished, and history is easily rewritten. But with a strong records and archives system, governments and institutions can be held to their word, and societies can move forward with confidence, clarity, and truth.

In this article, we dive into how records are more than just documentation and why investing in records and archives is investing in a better, more transparent future; they are the very foundation of ethical leadership, public trust, and democratic governance.

Understanding Records and Archives

Records are defined as any documented information created, received, and maintained as evidence or information by an organization or person in pursuance of legal obligations or the transaction of business (International Council on Archives [ICA], 2020). Archives, on the other hand, are records that are selected for permanent preservation due to their enduring value often historical, legal, or administrative. Unlike general information or data, records are evidential by nature; they document actions taken or decisions made and can be referenced for proof, justification, or legal defense.

These tools help institutions:

• Ensure continuity of services and decision-making.
• Retaining evidence of transactions.
• Preserve institutional memory.
• Enable transparency in operations.

Well-managed records provide a reliable and authentic source of information, which is crucial for governance, especially in a digital age where data manipulation is increasingly possible.

The Connection to Transparency and Accountability

Transparency refers to the openness of government processes and decisions, enabling citizens to access information and understand how public affairs are managed. Accountability, on the other hand, implies that public officials are answerable for their actions and decisions. Both concepts rely heavily on access to reliable records. Without accurate documentation, oversight bodies, journalists, auditors, and citizens cannot verify claims, track public spending, or challenge abuse of power.

As the International Records Management Trust (IRMT, 2009) asserts, “Without records, there can be no accountability, no rule of law, and no protection of citizens’ rights.”

Records and Archives: Pillars of Good Governance

How Records Enable Transparency

1. Tracing Decisions and Justifying Actions

Transparency is a cornerstone of good governance, and it depends heavily on access to accurate and timely information. Records provide a transparent trail of decision-making. From policy formulation to budget approvals and contract awards, well-kept records ensure that each action taken by a public official is documented and verifiable. This transparency reduces opportunities for corruption and enhances confidence in institutions (World Bank, 2018).

For example, when a government awards a contract for a public project, documentation such as tender notices, bid evaluations, and contract agreements must be properly recorded and accessible. If questions arise about favoritism or misuse of funds, these records offer concrete evidence.

For instance, public procurement processes, when properly recorded, can be audited to ensure that resources are allocated fairly and according to law. Governments that maintain transparent record systems are less prone to corruption and more likely to build public trust (World Bank, 2018). In Uganda, for example, the Inspectorate of Government (IGG) uses records in auditing and investigating corruption cases. Weak record-keeping systems have often been cited as a reason for failure to prosecute high-profile corruption cases due to lack of evidence (Kakumba, 2010).

2. Enhancing Access to Information

Records form the backbone of freedom of information (FOI) regimes. FOI laws typically grant citizens the right to request government-held information. However, these laws are only effective if the records exist and are properly managed.

In countries like Uganda, the Access to Information Act (2005) empowers citizens to demand information from government agencies. Yet, in practice, poor record-keeping has often undermined this right (Kakumba, 2010). Without records, access to information becomes a hollow promise.

3. Building Trust and Public Participation

When records are openly shared, public institutions appear more credible and approachable. This openness fosters citizen engagement, as people can participate in governance with full knowledge of the issues at hand. It also reduces suspicion and rumors, promoting a culture of mutual trust.

Digital transparency platforms, such as open budget portals or procurement databases, have proven effective in countries like Kenya and Brazil, where access to real-time records has improved civic oversight (Open Government Partnership, 2020).

How Records Enable Accountability

Accountability requires that public officials and institutions answer to the public and legal bodies for their actions. Without records, there is no trail of responsibility. Imagine a scenario where a government misuses development funds. With proper records, it becomes possible to identify who authorized the spending, when, and for what purpose. Without records, blame can easily be deflected or obscured. Moreover, archives preserve this information over time, making it possible for future generations to revisit past decisions and assess their impact. This long-term accountability fosters a culture of responsibility within public institutions (Ngulube, 2005).

1. Facilitating Oversight and Audit

Oversight institutions such as auditor generals, ombudsmen, and parliamentary committees rely on records to evaluate government performance. Audit trails help trace where money was spent, by whom, and for what purpose.

In cases of financial irregularities, records serve as the first line of evidence. Missing or falsified records are red flags, and their absence can in itself indicate wrongdoing.

2. Supporting Investigations and Legal Proceedings

Records are critical in legal accountability. Courts, anti-corruption bodies, and investigative agencies use records to build cases against those who abuse office. Fraud, human rights abuses, and illegal contracts can be prosecuted only when evidence exists, and that evidence usually comes in the form of documentation.

Records are essential in ensuring that legal obligations are upheld. Courts depend on accurate records to resolve disputes, while law enforcement relies on documentation to investigate and prosecute crimes. Without records, the legal system can be severely compromised.

3. Preserving Institutional Memory

Long-term accountability depends on institutional memory. When administrations change or staff turnover occurs, well-kept records ensure continuity and historical accountability. They help new leaders learn from past mistakes and maintain commitments. Without this memory, policy reversals become more likely, and previous actions are harder to evaluate or sustain (Ngulube & Tafor, 2006).

How Records Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision-Making

For governments to plan, budget, and implement effective policies, they need accurate and comprehensive information. Records and archives offer insights into past decisions, performance metrics, and public feedback, all of which help inform future planning.

This is especially critical during crises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries with strong records systems were better able to trace infection spread, distribute aid, and monitor public health policies (UNESCO, 2021).

Challenges Facing Records and Archives in Governance

Despite their importance, the role of records and archives is often underappreciated, especially in developing countries. Several barriers hinder their effectiveness:

1. Inadequate Infrastructure and Funding

Many national archives and records offices operate with obsolete equipment, insufficient storage, and limited budgets. This leads to poor preservation, loss of records, and an inability to digitize and modernize (Wamukoya & Mutula, 2005).

2. Lack of Skilled Professionals

Records management is a specialized field requiring training and continuous professional development. However, many government offices in countries like Uganda face a shortage of qualified archivists and records managers (Barata, Cain, & Routledge, 2001). This affects the quality and consistency of record-keeping.

3. Limited Awareness and Prioritization

Often, records management is seen as a clerical task rather than a strategic function. Political leaders may not prioritize it, and policy implementation is weak, even when laws exist to support proper records management (Kalusopa & Ngulube, 2012).

4. Digital Divide

The transition from paper to digital records presents new challenges. Many institutions lack the infrastructure, policies, or technical capacity to manage electronic records effectively, resulting in data loss or accessibility issues (International Records Management Trust [IRMT], 2009).

The Cost of Poor Records Management

Despite their importance, records management is often neglected. Many governments and institutions, particularly in developing countries, face chronic challenges:

• Disorganized filing systems
• Loss of documents due to poor storage
• Inadequate funding
• Low digital capacity
• Lack of trained personnel

In Uganda, for example, a 2010 review found that many local governments could not manage even basic administrative records, leading to the loss of critical data and impeding accountability (Wamukoya & Mutula, 2005).

Moreover, the move to electronic records has introduced new risks: digital records can be easily deleted, tampered with, or rendered inaccessible without proper policies, backups, and infrastructure (Kalusopa & Ngulube, 2012).

Strategies to Strengthen the Role of Records and Archives in Governance

To ensure that records continue to uphold transparency and accountability, several interventions are necessary:

1. Enforce Records Laws and Policies

Countries must implement and enforce legislation such as records management acts, freedom of information laws, and data protection regulations. These laws should clearly define responsibilities, retention schedules, access rights, and penalties for non-compliance. Laws such as the Records and Archives Management Act (Uganda, 2001) must be fully enforced across all government institutions. Additionally, legal frameworks should be updated to address digital records, data privacy, and long-term digital preservation.

2. Invest in Modern Infrastructure

Records offices, both physical and digital, require secure, accessible, and climate-controlled environments. Governments and institutions should digitize records where possible but also ensure that paper records are preserved and indexed.

Governments and institutions should fund the development of state-of-the-art archival facilities, both physical and digital. This includes investing in:

• Electronic Document and Records Management Systems (EDRMS)
• Cloud storage solutions
• Disaster recovery systems
• Cybersecurity tools for protecting sensitive records

Investments in Electronic Document and Records Management Systems (EDRMS) have shown success in places like Rwanda, where public records are now centrally managed and easier to audit (IRMT, 2011).

3. Train Records Professionals

Records management is a profession, not a clerical task. Public and private institutions must recruit trained records managers and archivists and offer continuous professional development. Collaboration with academic institutions is key in developing a pipeline of skilled professionals (Ngulube, 2005).

4. Raise Awareness and Political Support

Policymakers, public servants, and the general public must recognize the value of records. Awareness campaigns, stakeholder engagement, and integration into governance training can help elevate the status of records management. Celebrating events like International Archives Day (June 9) can serve as platforms for public engagement. Media campaigns and educational outreach can also foster greater appreciation for the role of records in society.

5. Regional and Global Collaboration

Partnerships with international organizations such as the International Council on Archives (ICA), UNESCO, and Open Government Partnership (OGP) can provide technical expertise, funding, and platforms for knowledge sharing. Uganda's National Records and Archives Department in Entebbe houses documents that trace the country’s colonial and post-independence journey. However, its impact has been limited by funding challenges, lack of digitization, and low public engagement.

Efforts have been made in collaboration with UNESCO to digitize historical documents, especially those related to human rights abuses during past regimes. These archives are invaluable not just for historical research but also for reconciliation, justice, and national healing (UNESCO, 2014). This highlights the broader potential of archives to go beyond governance; they can shape identity, preserve culture, and promote social justice.

6. The Digital Opportunity

The digital era offers both risks and rewards for records management. On the one hand, digital systems can improve access, reduce storage costs, and enable real-time transparency. On the other, they pose new threats: cybersecurity breaches, file corruption, metadata loss, and obsolescence.

To navigate this, institutions must adopt:

• Digital preservation policies
• Cloud and hybrid storage solutions
• Robust access controls
• Regular system audits

A well-executed digital records strategy can make governments and institutions more responsive, inclusive, and resilient, especially in crises like pandemics or disasters.

Conclusion

Records and archives may not command headlines or political slogans, but they are among the most powerful tools a society has to uphold truth, justice, and good governance. By documenting what was done, by whom, and for what reason, they form the bedrock of transparency and accountability. They protect citizens' rights, ensure legal compliance, and preserve the integrity of public institutions.

As nations face growing demands for open governance and public accountability, strengthening records and archives systems is no longer optional; it is essential. Governments must invest in modernising records infrastructure, training skilled professionals, and enforcing policies that recognise the central role of records in democracy. Only then can we fully unlock the power of these silent guardians of truth.

We would like to hear from you about this blog article or when you need our services. Please send us an email at galacticalsrecords@gmail.com or contact us through our socials.

References

Barata, K., Cain, P., & Routledge, B. (2001). Records, computers and resources: A difficult equation for sub-Saharan Africa. The Information Management Journal, 35(1), 28-36.

Harris, V. (2002). The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science, 2(1-2), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631

International Council on Archives (ICA). (2020). What are archives? https://www.ica.org/en/what-are-archives

International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 15489-1: Information and documentation—Records management—Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO.

International Records Management Trust (IRMT). (2009). Managing records as the basis for effective service delivery and accountability in development: An introduction to core principles for staff of the World Bank and its partners. https://www.irmt.org/

International Records Management Trust. (2009). Managing records as the basis for effective service delivery and accountability in development. https://www.irmt.org/

International Records Management Trust. (2011). Electronic records management in Africa: Problems and prospects. https://www.irmt.org

Kakumba, U. (2010). Local government citizen participation and rural development: Reflections on Uganda's decentralization system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309359049

Kakumba, U. (2010). Local government citizen participation and rural development: Reflections on Uganda’s decentralization system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309359049

Kalusopa, T., & Ngulube, P. (2012). Developing an e-records readiness framework for labour organizations in Botswana. Information Development, 28(3), 199–215.

Kalusopa, T., & Ngulube, P. (2012). Developing an e-records readiness framework for labour organisations in Botswana. Information Development, 28(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666911431475

Ngulube, P. (2005). Environmental monitoring and conservation of archives and records in eastern and southern Africa. Libri, 55(1), 29–35.

Ngulube, P. (2005). Environmental monitoring and conservation of archives and records in eastern and southern Africa. Libri, 55(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2005.29

Ngulube, P., & Tafor, V. (2006). The management of public records and archives in the member countries of ESARBICA. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810600682030

Ngulube, P., & Tafor, V. F. (2006). The management of public records and archives in the member countries of ESARBICA. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 57–83.

Open Government Partnership. (2020). The role of open data in fighting corruption. https://www.opengovpartnership.org

Uganda. (2001). The National Records and Archives Act, 2001. https://ulii.org

UNESCO. (2014). Preserving memory: The role of archives in transitional justice in Uganda. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

UNESCO. (2021). COVID-19 and access to information: How archives and records management supported pandemic response. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Wamukoya, J., & Mutula, S. M. (2005). E-records management and governance in East and Southern Africa. The Electronic Library, 23(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470510592822

World Bank. (2018). Strengthening governance through access to information: The role of records management. https://www.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2018). Strengthening governance through access to information: The role of records management. https://www.worldbank.org